I am getting a bit irritated by the bashing that the so-called gig economy is regularly taking in the media, where Uber, Grab, and Deliveroo bashing has become the sport of the day.
The main problem in my mind is not that the companies in question provide very little in terms of welfare for their workers compared to conventional companies, but that the gig economy is increasingly abused by people who work their gigs as full-time jobs ― the gig economy was never designed to do that!
The gig economy was created to allow people who need some extra cash to work and earn money quickly and without much hassle in terms of paperwork, or being tied down in contracts that do not suit their lifestyle. Students come to mind, who want to earn some extra spending money in their time off, or people who do hold a full-time job but want to earn a few extra pounds in their spare time to finance a particular project or holiday.
Unfortunately, this initial purpose has been more or less overtaken by people who now use the gig economy as their sole and full-time income. I guess their main motivation is the assumption that a period working in the gig economy in their CV still looks better than a period being unemployed. These people probably were not even planning to work longterm in the gig economy, but have been struggling to find a full-time job, and so are stuck in a rot.
The resulting situation is now that the increasing number of people who abuse the gig economy as full-time employment now demand that it treats them as full-time employees. Again, I sympathise with the sentiment, but they are asking for something the gig economy was never designed to provide.
The problem with all of this is that if we now redesign the gig economy to become full-time employment, by legislating to force the gig companies to provide the same level of welfare to their workers as normal employers, we effectively make the gig economy disappear; which then in turn causes problems to those people who depend on the gig economy, as their current life circumstances do not allow them to hold a full-time job. Most notably, we are depriving students of one of their main ways to finance their studies…
In my mind, what has to happen is the realisation that the gig economy is not there to provide full-time employment through the back door. If you want a job that feeds your family and lasts a lifetime, then the gig economy is not for you; and if you really think that you are so good at your gig that it should feed your family, then maybe you should take the plunge, go freelance, and start a business.
Maybe the real question we need to ask is why are there so many people who try to make a living through the gig economy, but the uneasy answer we will probably find down that route is that our record-low unemployment right now is not actually as low as the numbers suggest, or the politicians would like us to believe…
